Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-03-12

M/S. MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. vs COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHI

Citation / case number
SC 2003/6259
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S. MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD.
Respondent
COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHI
Author
R. F. NARIMAN
Bench
ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN A.K. SIKRI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the applicability of Rule 57F of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, in the context of differential duty demanded from M/s. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. for the processing of inputs. The Court held that the process of Electro Deposition Coating (EDC) did not constitute 'manufacture' as defined under the law, thus the appellant was not liable to pay the differential duty of Rs.2,00,20,310.14. The judgment clarified the interpretation of 'manufacture' in relation to value addition and excise duty liability.

M/S. MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. vs COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHI · Niyam