Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-03-27

M/S. VIR RUBBER PRODUCTS P. LTD. vs COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MUMBAI-III

Citation / case number
SC 2003/17338
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S. VIR RUBBER PRODUCTS P. LTD.
Respondent
COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MUMBAI-III
Author
A. K. SIKRI
Bench
ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN A.K. SIKRI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled on the interpretation of Notification No. 1/93 concerning excise duty exemptions for Small Scale Industrial units under Section 5A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court held that the aggregate value of clearances must include goods supplied under brand names of other companies, thereby affirming the lower authorities' decision that the appellant exceeded the Rs. 3 crore threshold for exemption. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, upholding the excise duty liability of the appellant.

M/S. VIR RUBBER PRODUCTS P. LTD. vs COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MUMBAI-III · Niyam