Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-03-17

VIKRAM CEMENT vs STATE OF M.P. .

Citation / case number
SC 2003/1063
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
VIKRAM CEMENT
Respondent
STATE OF M.P. .
Author
A.K. SIKRI
Bench
ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN A.K. SIKRI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that the Explanation appended to Notification No. A-3-80-98-ST-V (49) dated 4.5.1999, which denied refund of excess entry tax paid by the appellants under the M.P. Sthaniya Kshetra Me Mal Ke Pravesh Par Kar Adhiniyam, 1976, was arbitrary and discriminatory, violating Article 14 of the Constitution. The Court held that the classification created by the Explanation lacked intelligible differentia and did not serve any legitimate objective. Consequently, the Court set aside the Explanation, allowing the appellants to claim refunds for the excess entry tax paid.

VIKRAM CEMENT vs STATE OF M.P. . · Niyam