Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-03-11

Edward vs Inspector Of Police, Aandimadam P.S

Citation / case number
AIR 2015 SUPREME COURT 2374
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Edward
Respondent
Inspector Of Police, Aandimadam P.S
Author
Pinaki Chandra Ghose
Bench
R.K. Agrawal, Pinaki Chandra Ghose

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the accused under Section 304 Part II IPC, affirming the High Court's decision which had reduced the charges from Section 302 IPC. The Court emphasized the importance of reliable eyewitness testimony, referencing the cases of State of Orissa v. Brahamananda Nanda and State of Karnataka v. Venkatesh, noting that the absence of corroborative evidence from the treating doctor weakened the prosecution's case. Ultimately, the Court found that the prosecution had established the case beyond reasonable doubt despite the challenges in eyewitness reliability.

Edward vs Inspector Of Police, Aandimadam P.S · Niyam