Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-07-20

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, COMMISSIONER, DELHI-III, GURGAON vs M/S KAP CONES, UDYOG VIHAR, PHASE-V, GURGAON

Citation / case number
SC 2014/27078
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, COMMISSIONER, DELHI-III, GURGAON
Respondent
M/S KAP CONES, UDYOG VIHAR, PHASE-V, GURGAON
Author
Dipak Misra

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of delay in the review process under Section 35-E(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, holding that the Committee of Chief Commissioners must issue a review order within three months of the original order's communication. The Court found that the eight-day delay in issuing the review order was justified due to genuine reasons, thus allowing the appeal to proceed. The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory timelines while also recognizing the need for flexibility in certain circumstances.

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, COMMISSIONER, DELHI-III, GURGAON vs M/S KAP CONES, UDYOG VIHAR, PHASE-V, GURGAON · Niyam