RAHUL YADAV vs M/S. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. .

The Supreme Court ruled that the appellant, Rahul Yadav, was entitled to a dealership agreement with Indian Oil Corporation based on the letter of intent issued on 6.7.2001, which required him to own suitable land and execute a long-term lease. The Court emphasized the need for transparency and fairness in the allotment of retail outlets, referencing the principles established in Onkar Lal Bajaj v. Union of India and Common Cause v. Union of India. The judgment reinforced the importance of non-arbitrariness in government dealings and directed the formation of a committee to examine similar cases, ensuring adherence to fair criteria in dealership allotments.