Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-07-15

P.A.JOSE ETC. vs COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX, KOTTAYAM ETC

Citation / case number
SC 2013/23978
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
P.A.JOSE ETC.
Respondent
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX, KOTTAYAM ETC
Author
ANIL R. DAVE,ARUN MISHRA,AMITAVA ROY
Bench
ANIL R. DAVE,ARUN MISHRA,AMITAVA ROY

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred by not framing a substantial question of law as required under Section 27A(3) of The Wealth Tax Act, 1957, before deciding the appeal. The Court emphasized that the appeal can only be admitted if such a question is formulated, and since this was not done, the matter was remitted back to the High Court for proper consideration. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeals were allowed without costs.

P.A.JOSE ETC. vs COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX, KOTTAYAM ETC · Niyam