Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-07-02

S.R.SUKUMAR vs S.SUNAAD RAGHURAM

Citation / case number
SC 2012/17579
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
S.R.SUKUMAR
Respondent
S.SUNAAD RAGHURAM
Author
R. BANUMATHI
Bench
R. BANUMATHI T.S. THAKUR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to allow an amendment to a criminal complaint under Section 200 of the Cr.P.C., affirming that no prejudice was caused as cognizance had not yet been taken at the time of the amendment. The Court clarified that the absence of a specific provision for amendment in the Criminal Procedure Code does not preclude the courts from allowing amendments that do not affect the merits of the case. The appeal was dismissed, confirming the lower courts' orders allowing the amendment and proceeding with the case.

S.R.SUKUMAR vs S.SUNAAD RAGHURAM · Niyam