Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-07-06

KARUNA PURTI vs STATE(NCT OF DELHI)

Citation / case number
SC 2011/30123
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
KARUNA PURTI
Respondent
STATE(NCT OF DELHI)
Author
VIKRAMAJIT SEN
Bench
ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE VIKRAMAJIT SEN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 7 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, an unwed mother is not required to notify the putative father of her petition for guardianship of her child, as the welfare of the child is paramount. The Court emphasized that the legal obligations of parents should not overshadow the child's best interests, and the requirement to disclose the father's identity is not absolute. The Court overturned the High Court's dismissal of the mother's application, allowing her to proceed without naming the father, thereby prioritizing the child's welfare over procedural formalities.

KARUNA PURTI vs STATE(NCT OF DELHI) · Niyam