Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-07-13

VIJAY MALLYA vs ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE,MIN.OF FINANCE.

Citation / case number
SC 2007/25802
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
VIJAY MALLYA
Respondent
ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE,MIN.OF FINANCE.
Author
ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
Bench
ADARSH KUMAR GOEL J. CHELAMESWAR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision regarding the summons issued to Vijay Mallya under Section 40 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, for failing to obtain necessary permissions for an advertisement agreement. The Court clarified that the framing of a composite charge under Section 56 of the Act was valid and did not violate the procedure under Section 219 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's ruling that the appellant's defaults in attending court were sufficient to proceed with the case.

VIJAY MALLYA vs ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE,MIN.OF FINANCE. · Niyam