Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-07-28

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE VAPI vs M/S GLOBAL HEALTH CARE PRODUCTS LTD.&ORS

Citation / case number
SC 2005/14426
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE VAPI
Respondent
M/S GLOBAL HEALTH CARE PRODUCTS LTD.&ORS
Author
A.K. SIKRI
Bench
ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN A.K. SIKRI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the classification of the product 'Close-Up Whitening' under Chapter sub-heading 3306.90 was erroneous, as it was determined to be a type of toothpaste and should be classified under Chapter sub-heading 3306.10. The Court emphasized that the essential character of the product remained unchanged despite minor differences in composition. Consequently, the Court upheld the Revenue's demand for differential excise duty under Section 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, confirming the imposition of penalties and fines.

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE VAPI vs M/S GLOBAL HEALTH CARE PRODUCTS LTD.&ORS · Niyam