Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-07-21

Delhi Development Authority vs P.R. Samanta

Citation / case number
AIR 2015 SUPREME COURT 3035
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Delhi Development Authority
Respondent
P.R. Samanta
Author
Shiva Kirti Singh
Bench
Shiva Kirti Singh, Vikramajit Sen

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the appeal under Section 55 of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969, concerning the reasonableness of interest on a registration deposit. The Court held that the appellant, Delhi Development Authority, was bound by the terms of the scheme which stipulated a 7% interest rate on refunds, as agreed upon by the respondent. The Court dismissed the respondent's claim for a higher interest rate of 15%, affirming the Commission's decision that the terms were clear and binding.

Delhi Development Authority vs P.R. Samanta · Niyam