Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-07-21

M/S. Hcl Ltd vs Commissioner Of Customs, New Delhi

Citation / case number
AIR 2015 SC (SUPP) 2081
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S. Hcl Ltd
Respondent
Commissioner Of Customs, New Delhi
Author
A.K. Sikri
Bench
Rohinton Fali Nariman, A.K. Sikri

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court analyzed the classification of the Risograph machine under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, determining whether it falls under sub-heading 8443.50 for printing machinery or sub-heading 8472.90 for office machines. The Court held that the Risograph does not fit neatly into either category, as it is not specifically described in the sub-headings, leading to the conclusion that it should be classified under the residual clause of 'Other'. The outcome favored the appellant's argument for a lower duty rate based on its classification as printing machinery.

M/S. Hcl Ltd vs Commissioner Of Customs, New Delhi · Niyam