Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-07-29

Yakub Abdul Razak Memon vs State Of Maharashtra, Thr. The ...

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Yakub Abdul Razak Memon
Respondent
State Of Maharashtra, Thr. The ...
Author
Dipak Misra
Bench
Amitava Roy, Prafulla C. Pant, Dipak Misra

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed a writ petition under Article 32 challenging the execution of a death sentence awarded under the TADA (P) Act, 1987. The Court held that the dismissal of the curative petition was procedurally flawed as it was not constituted according to Rule 4 of Order XLVIII of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013, which mandates a specific composition for such petitions. Consequently, the Court emphasized the importance of adhering to procedural safeguards in capital punishment cases, leading to a stay on the execution until the pending application for pardon is resolved.

Yakub Abdul Razak Memon vs State Of Maharashtra, Thr. The ... · Niyam