Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-01-20

LAXMIDEVAMMA vs RANGANATH .

Citation / case number
SC 2013/12573
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
LAXMIDEVAMMA
Respondent
RANGANATH .
Author
R. BANUMATHI
Bench
R. BANUMATHI V. GOPALA GOWDA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that the appellants, owners of land earmarked for road use, retain ownership of the property since no road was constructed as per the City Development Authority's approval. The Court held that the appellants are entitled to compensation for the land when acquired by the competent authority, affirming their absolute ownership of the 'A' schedule property. The Court also addressed the encroachment issue, emphasizing the need for proper legal recourse to reclaim possession of the 'B' schedule property.

LAXMIDEVAMMA vs RANGANATH . · Niyam