Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-01-21

VINOD KUMAR vs STATE OF PUNJAB

Citation / case number
SC 2011/40354
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
VINOD KUMAR
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB
Author
Dipak Misra
Bench
ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN DIPAK MISRA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court emphasized the importance of adhering to Section 309 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, which mandates the expeditious conduct of trials. The Court criticized the trial judge for granting unwarranted adjournments and failing to ensure a fair trial, which undermines the judicial process. The judgment reiterates that it is the duty of the courts to maintain the sanctity of criminal trials and prevent delays caused by the passive acceptance of adjournment requests, thereby upholding the right to a fair trial.

VINOD KUMAR vs STATE OF PUNJAB · Niyam