Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-01-06

NARGIS JAL HARADHVALA vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA .

Citation / case number
SC 2007/34505
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
NARGIS JAL HARADHVALA
Respondent
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA .
Author
M.Y. Eqbal
Bench
ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE M.Y. EQBAL

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 20 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, the percentage of land to be surrendered to government nominees must not exceed 5% of the total accommodation available, as established in Shantistar Builders vs. N.K. Toitame (1990) 1 SCC 520. The Court found that the appellant had complied with this requirement by offering flats that constituted 5.86% of the net permissible FSI, and thus the demand for additional flats by the respondents was not justified. The appeal was allowed, and the High Court's dismissal of the writ petition was set aside.

NARGIS JAL HARADHVALA vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA . · Niyam