Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-01-20

Laxmidevamma & Ors vs Ranganath & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2015 SC (SUPP) 602
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Laxmidevamma & Ors
Respondent
Ranganath & Ors
Author
R. Banumathi
Bench
R. Banumathi, V. Gopala Gowda

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the trial court's decree affirming the appellants-plaintiffs' ownership of 'A' schedule property and their entitlement to possession of 'B' schedule property, emphasizing that the earmarking of land for road use does not extinguish ownership rights unless formally acquired under relevant statutes. The Court clarified that compensation is due only upon formal acquisition by the competent authority, referencing the principles of land ownership and acquisition. The judgment of the High Court was modified to reflect these legal principles, ensuring the appellants' rights are protected under the law.

Laxmidevamma & Ors vs Ranganath & Ors · Niyam