Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-01-06

Phool Patti And Anr vs Ram Singh(Dead)Through Lrs. & Anr

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Phool Patti And Anr
Respondent
Ram Singh(Dead)Through Lrs. & Anr
Author
Madan B. Lokur
Bench
C. Nagappan, Madan B. Lokur

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the validity of a consent decree under Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, determining that a family settlement can be valid even if not formally documented, provided there is mutual consent. The Court held that the decree obtained by Ram Singh was valid and binding, as Bhagwana had admitted the claims, thus affirming the principles of family settlements in Hindu law. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the rights of Ram Singh over the disputed property.

Phool Patti And Anr vs Ram Singh(Dead)Through Lrs. & Anr · Niyam