Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-02-26

BATHIDA DEV. AUTH. FORMERLY KNOWN AS (PUDA) vs IQBAL SINGH

Citation / case number
SC 2014/28233
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
BATHIDA DEV. AUTH. FORMERLY KNOWN AS (PUDA)
Respondent
IQBAL SINGH
Author
VIKRAMAJIT SEN
Bench
PRAFULLA C. PANT VIKRAMAJIT SEN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision that the land acquisition had lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 2013 due to non-taking of possession and non-payment of compensation. The Court confirmed that these factors are sufficient grounds for declaring the acquisition void. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's ruling.

BATHIDA DEV. AUTH. FORMERLY KNOWN AS (PUDA) vs IQBAL SINGH · Niyam