Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-02-11

KRISHNA HARE GAUR vs VINOD KUMAR TYAGI

Citation / case number
SC 2014/25994
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
KRISHNA HARE GAUR
Respondent
VINOD KUMAR TYAGI
Author
R. BANUMATHI
Bench
R. BANUMATHI V. GOPALA GOWDA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision that the appellant's claim was barred by the principle of res judicata, as the matter had been previously adjudicated in Writ Petition No. 70074/2010 and Writ Appeal No. 13537/2011. The Court emphasized that the findings of the District Basic Shiksha Adhikari regarding the qualifications of Respondent No.1 were conclusive and had been affirmed by the High Court. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower court's ruling.

KRISHNA HARE GAUR vs VINOD KUMAR TYAGI · Niyam