Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-02-24

S. PERUMAL vs K. AMBIKA & ANR

Citation / case number
SC 2013/27878
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
S. PERUMAL
Respondent
K. AMBIKA & ANR
Author
R. BANUMATHI
Bench
R. BANUMATHI V. GOPALA GOWDA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's compensation of Rs. 25,300 under the Motor Vehicles Act was inadequate given the appellant's severe injuries, including multiple rib fractures, which impaired his ability to work. The Court emphasized the need for proper assessment of injuries and loss of earning capacity, overruling the High Court's decision that deemed the injuries as simple. The Court enhanced the compensation to reflect the permanent disability suffered by the appellant, thereby ensuring just compensation under the relevant provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act.

S. PERUMAL vs K. AMBIKA & ANR · Niyam