Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-02-16

STATE OF KARNATAKA TR.SEC.HSG.& URB.&ANR vs VASAVADATTA CEMENT

Citation / case number
SC 2012/9
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE OF KARNATAKA TR.SEC.HSG.& URB.&ANR
Respondent
VASAVADATTA CEMENT
Author
SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
Bench
VIKRAMAJIT SEN SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision regarding the non-compliance of Section 9 of the Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1961, which mandates proper notification procedures for altering municipal limits. The Court emphasized that the absence of adequate posting of notifications invalidates the process of inclusion of areas within municipal limits. Consequently, the appeal by the State of Karnataka was dismissed, affirming the High Court's ruling that the notifications were not properly executed as per statutory requirements.

STATE OF KARNATAKA TR.SEC.HSG.& URB.&ANR vs VASAVADATTA CEMENT · Niyam