Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-02-04

VIVEK RAI & ANR. vs HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND THR.REG.GEN & OR

Citation / case number
SC 2012/60323
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
VIVEK RAI & ANR.
Respondent
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND THR.REG.GEN & OR
Author
ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
Bench
ADARSH KUMAR GOEL T.S. THAKUR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that Rule 159 of the High Court of Jharkhand Rules, 2001, which mandates that a petitioner must surrender to custody before a revision petition under Sections 397 and 401 of the Cr.P.C. can be admitted, is not violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution. The Court emphasized that subordinate legislation can set procedural requirements that do not conflict with substantive statutory provisions. The petitioners' challenge to the validity of the Rule was dismissed, affirming the High Court's authority to regulate its procedures.

VIVEK RAI & ANR. vs HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND THR.REG.GEN & OR · Niyam