Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-02-24

VINOD CHANDRA SEMWAL vs SPL.POLICE ESTABLISGHMENT UJJAIN

Citation / case number
SC 2011/24434
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
VINOD CHANDRA SEMWAL
Respondent
SPL.POLICE ESTABLISGHMENT UJJAIN
Author
SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
Bench
N.V. RAMANA SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to set aside the Special Judge's order, which had declined to take cognizance of the appellant's alleged offences under Section 13(1)(d) and Section 120B IPC due to lack of prosecution sanction. The Court emphasized that the appellant, while acting as Chairman of the Town Improvement Trust, was not entitled to immunity under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, as he acted beyond his official capacity. The ruling clarified the applicability of Section 19 of the P.C. Act and Section 197 CrPC regarding the necessity of sanction for prosecution.

VINOD CHANDRA SEMWAL vs SPL.POLICE ESTABLISGHMENT UJJAIN · Niyam