Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-02-16

WARSALIGANJ SAHKARI CHINI MILL MAZD.UNIN vs STATE OF BIHAR .

Citation / case number
SC 2008/28333
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
WARSALIGANJ SAHKARI CHINI MILL MAZD.UNIN
Respondent
STATE OF BIHAR .
Author
KURIAN
Bench
KURIAN JOSEPH M.Y. EQBAL

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether seasonal workers of closed sugar factories are entitled to retaining allowance. The Court upheld the High Court's decision that no retaining allowance is payable due to the closure of the factories. However, it directed that the retaining allowance, which would have been payable had the factories been operational, should be considered for calculating pensionary benefits under the Exit Settlement scheme. The appeals were disposed of accordingly, with no costs awarded.

WARSALIGANJ SAHKARI CHINI MILL MAZD.UNIN vs STATE OF BIHAR . · Niyam