Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-02-02

Sahoo Baba (D) Tr.Lrs.& Anr vs Haryana Urban Devl.Auth.& Anr

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2015 SC 484
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Sahoo Baba (D) Tr.Lrs.& Anr
Respondent
Haryana Urban Devl.Auth.& Anr
Author
Anil R. Dave
Bench
Shiva Kirti Singh, Anil R. Dave

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that the legal heirs of the original allottee of a shop may retain possession if they pay the outstanding amount of Rs.3,90,000/- by April 30, 2015, including interest. The Court emphasized that failure to pay would result in the loss of possession and the amount paid would be considered as occupation charges. The judgment is specific to the facts of the case and does not set a precedent.

Sahoo Baba (D) Tr.Lrs.& Anr vs Haryana Urban Devl.Auth.& Anr · Niyam