Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-02-20

The Rajasthan State Road Transport ... vs Revat Singh

Citation / case number
AIR 2015 SC (SUPP) 348
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
The Rajasthan State Road Transport ...
Respondent
Revat Singh
Author
Prafulla C. Pant
Bench
Dipak Misra, Prafulla C. Pant

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to direct the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation to consider the respondent's application for compassionate appointment as a driver, despite the respondent's lack of qualifications, including not being matriculate and holding only a light vehicle driving license. The Court reiterated that compassionate appointments must adhere to eligibility criteria as established in I.G.(Karmik) and others vs. Prahalad Mani Tripathi, which states that such appointments cannot be claimed as a matter of right. The outcome confirmed the High Court's ruling while emphasizing the need for adherence to qualifications in compassionate appointments.

The Rajasthan State Road Transport ... vs Revat Singh · Niyam