Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-02-20

M/S Bhandari Udyog Ltd vs Industrial Facilitation Council & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2015 SC (CIV) 1024
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S Bhandari Udyog Ltd
Respondent
Industrial Facilitation Council & Anr
Author
M. Y. Eqbal
Bench
Kurian Joseph, M.Y. Eqbal

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the jurisdiction to entertain an application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, lies with the court where the arbitration took place, which in this case was Raichur, Karnataka. The Court found that the Bombay High Court erred in affirming the District Court's jurisdiction at Latur, Maharashtra, as the arbitration proceedings were conducted in Raichur and the appellant had specified jurisdiction in their invoices. Consequently, the Court ruled that the application under Section 34 should be heard by the District Court at Raichur, thereby allowing the appeal.

M/S Bhandari Udyog Ltd vs Industrial Facilitation Council & Anr · Niyam