Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-12-16

PREM NATH BALI vs REG.,HIGH COURT OF DELHI

Citation / case number
SC 2008/34575
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
PREM NATH BALI
Respondent
REG.,HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Author
Abhay Manohar Sapre
Bench
J. CHELAMESWAR,ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE,,J. CHELAMESWAR,ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's dismissal of the appellant's writ petition challenging the disciplinary proceedings against him under Rule 14 of the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965. The Court emphasized that the prolonged disciplinary process, lasting over nine years, did not violate the principles of natural justice as the appellant was given opportunities to defend himself. The Court held that the period of suspension could not be counted as duty until the disciplinary proceedings were concluded, affirming the authority's decision to impose compulsory retirement as a valid penalty.

PREM NATH BALI vs REG.,HIGH COURT OF DELHI · Niyam