Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-12-14

M/S GUJARAT INDUSTRIES vs COMMR.OF CENTRAL EXCISE-I,AHMEDABAD

Citation / case number
SC 2007/34478
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S GUJARAT INDUSTRIES
Respondent
COMMR.OF CENTRAL EXCISE-I,AHMEDABAD
Author
A.K. SIKRI
Bench
ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN A.K. SIKRI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed whether the cold-rolling process of hot-rolled stainless steel patta/pattis constitutes 'manufacture' under Section 2(f)(i) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court upheld the CESTAT's ruling that cold-rolling does amount to manufacture, referencing Chapter Note 4 of Chapter 72 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The Court also confirmed the invocation of the extended period of limitation under Section 11A for demanding duty and imposing penalties on the assessee, affirming the lower authorities' decisions.

M/S GUJARAT INDUSTRIES vs COMMR.OF CENTRAL EXCISE-I,AHMEDABAD · Niyam