Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-12-02

MULCHAND BAKHRU vs T.N. VAIDYA

Citation / case number
SC 1999/18753
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MULCHAND BAKHRU
Respondent
T.N. VAIDYA
Author
KURIAN
Bench
ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN KURIAN JOSEPH

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court reviewed its earlier judgment in Civil Appeal No. 10747 of 2013, which upheld the Karnataka High Court's decision that Civic Amenity Site No. 2 could only be used for a bank as per Section 38A of the Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976. The Court found factual errors in the High Court's ruling regarding the site's earmarking, leading to the conclusion that the allotment to Bharat Petroleum Corporation for a petrol pump was invalid. The review petitions were allowed, and the earlier judgment was recalled, emphasizing the need for accurate interpretation of land use designations under the Act.

MULCHAND BAKHRU vs T.N. VAIDYA · Niyam