Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-12-02

Purushotham vs State Of Karnataka & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2016 SUPREME COURT 84
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Purushotham
Respondent
State Of Karnataka & Ors
Bench
Rohinton Fali Nariman, Kurian Joseph

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court reviewed the judgment dated 29.11.2013 concerning the allotment of Civic Amenity Site No. 2, which was initially earmarked for a 'Park' and later for a 'Bank', under Section 38A of the Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976. The Court found that the High Court's conclusion was based on a misinterpretation of the site's designation, leading to the dismissal of appeals by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited and others. The Court allowed the review petitions, recalling the previous judgment and directing a fresh examination of the matter in light of new documents obtained under the Right to Information Act.

Purushotham vs State Of Karnataka & Ors · Niyam