Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-08-18

RAJ BALA vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

Citation / case number
SC 2015/12091
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RAJ BALA
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ETC. ETC.
Author
Dipak Misra
Bench
PRAFULLA C. PANT DIPAK MISRA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court emphasized the principle of proportionality in sentencing, asserting that punishment must not be excessively disproportionate to the crime committed. The Court held that sentencing should consider various factors such as the nature of culpability, the convict's antecedents, age, potential for reformation, and the societal impact of the crime. The judgment reiterated that judicial discretion in sentencing must be rational and based on the facts of each case, aligning with the principles established in Gopal Singh v. State of Uttarakhand and Shailesh Jasvantbhai v. State of Gujarat.

RAJ BALA vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ETC. ETC. · Niyam