Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-08-25

M/S. PUROLATOR INDIA LTD. vs COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, DELHI-III

Citation / case number
SC 2005/2838
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S. PUROLATOR INDIA LTD.
Respondent
COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, DELHI-III
Author
R.F. Nariman
Bench
ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN A.K. SIKRI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the eligibility of M/s Purolator India Ltd. for deductions on excise duty under Section 4 of the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944, specifically regarding volume discount, sales tax, and cash discount. The Court upheld the Commissioner's decision to invoke the extended period of limitation under the first proviso to Section 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, confirming a duty demand of Rs. 44,66,247/- and a penalty of Rs. 49,66,247/-. The ruling clarified the conditions under which deductions can be claimed and the implications of non-compliance with excise regulations.

M/S. PUROLATOR INDIA LTD. vs COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, DELHI-III · Niyam