Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-08-21

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NAGPUR-I vs M/S. INDORAMA SYNTHETICS (I) LTD.

Citation / case number
SC 2005/27614
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NAGPUR-I
Respondent
M/S. INDORAMA SYNTHETICS (I) LTD.
Author
A.K. SIKRI
Bench
ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN A.K. SIKRI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the interpretation of 'transaction value' under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, in the context of deemed exports. The Court upheld the Tribunal's ruling that statutory benefits, such as drawbacks received from the government, do not constitute 'additional consideration' from the buyer, thus affirming that such amounts should not be included in the transaction value for excise duty calculations. The appeal by the Commissioner of Central Excise was dismissed, confirming the Tribunal's decision.

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NAGPUR-I vs M/S. INDORAMA SYNTHETICS (I) LTD. · Niyam