Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-08-20

COMMNR.,CENTRAL EXCISE & CUSTOMS, KERALA vs M/S. LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD.

Citation / case number
SC 2004/5586
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
COMMNR.,CENTRAL EXCISE & CUSTOMS, KERALA
Respondent
M/S. LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD.
Author
ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN A.K. SIKRI
Bench
ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN A.K. SIKRI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether service tax can be levied on indivisible works contracts prior to the enactment of the Finance Act, 2007. The Court reaffirmed the principle established in State of Madras v. Gannon Dunkerley & Co. (1959) that such contracts are composite and indivisible, thus not subject to service tax before the specified date. The Court held that the introduction of the Finance Act, 2007, clarified the taxability of these contracts, and prior to this, no service tax could be imposed on them.

COMMNR.,CENTRAL EXCISE & CUSTOMS, KERALA vs M/S. LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. · Niyam