Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-08-12

D.R. ENTERPRISES LTD. vs ASSTT. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS .

Citation / case number
SC 2002/19667
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
D.R. ENTERPRISES LTD.
Respondent
ASSTT. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS .
Author
A.K. SIKRI
Bench
N.V. RAMANA A.K. SIKRI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that the appellant, D.R. Enterprises Ltd., was not entitled to the concessional rate of customs duty under Notification No. 114/80-CUS due to failure to meet the eligibility condition of the machine's output being 30,000 copies per hour. The Court upheld the High Court's finding that the machine's output was only 25,000 copies per hour as per the manufacturer's leaflet, thus affirming the customs authorities' decision to warehouse the machine under Section 49 of the Customs Act, 1962. The appeal was dismissed, confirming the High Court's judgment.

D.R. ENTERPRISES LTD. vs ASSTT. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS . · Niyam