Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-08-12

S.M. Asif vs Virendra Kumar Bajaj

Citation / case number
AIR 2015 SUPREME COURT 3678
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
S.M. Asif
Respondent
Virendra Kumar Bajaj
Author
R. Banumathi
Bench
R. Banumathi, V. Gopala Gowda, T.S. Thakur

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the appeals against the Delhi High Court's orders dismissing the appellant-tenant's appeal and review petition regarding eviction from leased premises. The Court noted that the appellant had not pressed the appeal on merits and sought adjournment after changing counsel, which the High Court denied. The Court held that the High Court's decision to dispose of the appeal was justified as the appellant failed to demonstrate a valid reason for the adjournment request, affirming the lower court's order under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act.

S.M. Asif vs Virendra Kumar Bajaj · Niyam