Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-08-25

C.C.E., Chennai vs Hindustan Lever Ltd

Citation / case number
AIR 2015 SC (SUPP) 2424
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
C.C.E., Chennai
Respondent
Hindustan Lever Ltd
Author
A.K. Sikri
Bench
Rohinton Fali Nariman, A.K. Sikri

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the classification of Vaseline Intensive Care Heel Guard (VHG) under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, determining whether it is a skin care preparation under Chapter Heading 3304.00 or a medicament under Chapter Heading 3003.10. The Court held that VHG is a skin care preparation, as it does not possess curing properties, thus classifying it under Chapter 3304.00 and subjecting it to a 40% excise duty. The judgment clarified the distinction between cosmetic products and medicaments based on their intended use and properties.

C.C.E., Chennai vs Hindustan Lever Ltd · Niyam