Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2015

Supreme Court of India · 2015-04-07

Supreme Court Advocates-On-Record ... vs Union Of India

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Supreme Court Advocates-On-Record ...
Respondent
Union Of India
Author
Anil R. Dave
Bench
Madan B. Lokur, J. Chelameswar, Anil R. Dave

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the validity of the Constitution (Ninety-Ninth Amendment) Act, 2014 and the National Judicial Appointment Commission Act, 2014, asserting that these laws potentially alter the basic structure of the Constitution. The Court determined that substantial questions of law regarding constitutional interpretation are involved, warranting referral to a larger bench as per Article 145(3). The petitions were not decided on merits, and the Court declined to grant interim relief at this stage.

Supreme Court Advocates-On-Record ... vs Union Of India · Niyam