Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2014

Supreme Court of India · 2014-09-19

VIJAY THAKUR vs STATE OF H.P.

Citation / case number
SC 2010/15120
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
VIJAY THAKUR
Respondent
STATE OF H.P.
Author
A.K. SIKRI
Bench
A.K. SIKRI J. CHELAMESWAR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the convictions of Vijay Thakur and Surjeet Khachi under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC for the murder of Santosh Kumar and Dharam Pal, affirming the life sentences and fines imposed by the lower courts. The Court found sufficient evidence of premeditated murder and robbery under Section 392 IPC, noting the brutal nature of the crime and the corroborative testimonies of witnesses. The appeal was dismissed, reinforcing the principle that circumstantial evidence can be sufficient for conviction when it forms a complete chain leading to the guilt of the accused.

VIJAY THAKUR vs STATE OF H.P. · Niyam