Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2014

Supreme Court of India · 2014-09-03

COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, DELHI vs M/S. MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD.

Citation / case number
SC 2004/11729
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, DELHI
Respondent
M/S. MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD.
Author
Madan B. Lokur

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that the High Powered Committee (HPC) under Rule 28-C of the Haryana General Sales Tax Rules 1975 did not grant a tax concession to the respondent but merely deferred the payment of sales tax. The Court emphasized that the HPC's decision was final and binding, and the respondent's retention of sales tax was not justified under the provisions of the Rules. Consequently, the Tribunal's ruling was overturned in favor of the Revenue, affirming the legality of the tax collection.

COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, DELHI vs M/S. MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. · Niyam