Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2014

Supreme Court of India · 2014-09-23

Vinod Kumar vs State Of Punjab

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Vinod Kumar
Respondent
State Of Punjab
Author
Dipak Misra
Bench
Rohinton Fali Nariman, Dipak Misra

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court emphasized the importance of adhering to Section 309 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, which mandates the expeditious conduct of trials. The Court criticized the trial judge for granting unwarranted adjournments, which undermined the integrity of the trial process and the pursuit of truth. The judgment reinforced that the primary duty of criminal courts is to ensure a fair trial, free from unnecessary delays and interruptions, thereby upholding the rule of law.

Vinod Kumar vs State Of Punjab · Niyam