Supreme Court of India · 2014-09-23
Vinod Kumar vs State Of Punjab
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Petitioner
- Vinod Kumar
- Respondent
- State Of Punjab
- Author
- Dipak Misra
- Bench
- Rohinton Fali Nariman, Dipak Misra
Judgment text excerpt
The Supreme Court emphasized the importance of adhering to Section 309 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, which mandates the expeditious conduct of trials. The Court criticized the trial judge for granting unwarranted adjournments, which undermined the integrity of the trial process and the pursuit of truth. The judgment reinforced that the primary duty of criminal courts is to ensure a fair trial, free from unnecessary delays and interruptions, thereby upholding the rule of law.