Supreme Court of India · 2014-09-22
M/S Ashoka Tubewell & Engg Corp.Etc Etc vs Union Of India Etc Etc
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Petitioner
- M/S Ashoka Tubewell & Engg Corp.Etc Etc
- Respondent
- Union Of India Etc Etc
- Author
- Anil R. Dave
- Bench
- Uday Umesh Lalit, Anil R. Dave
Judgment text excerpt
The Supreme Court addressed the validity of an Arbitrator's appointment under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, in light of a specific arbitration clause requiring a Gazetted Railway Officer as the sole arbitrator. The Court held that the appointment of Justice Kalyanmoy Ganguly, a retired High Court Judge, was valid due to the mutual consent of both parties, despite the clause's stipulation. The Court overturned the Calcutta High Court's decision that had set aside the Award on the grounds of invalid appointment, thereby reinstating the Award.