Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2014

Supreme Court of India · 2014-10-14

K.R.SUNDRAM@ SUNDARARAJAN vs THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER& SPC.TAHIS

Citation / case number
SC 2010/20260
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
K.R.SUNDRAM@ SUNDARARAJAN
Respondent
THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER& SPC.TAHIS
Author
ADARSH KUMAR GOEL V. GOPALA GOWDA
Bench
ADARSH KUMAR GOEL V. GOPALA GOWDA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in excluding a crucial sale instance from consideration when determining compensation for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Court emphasized that the mere mistake in the value should not lead to exclusion and that the compensation should reflect the market value of Rs.6,000/- per cent, considering the prime location of the land. The Court set aside the High Court's determination of Rs.2,000/- per cent and reinstated the higher compensation awarded by the Reference Court.

K.R.SUNDRAM@ SUNDARARAJAN vs THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER& SPC.TAHIS · Niyam