Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2014

Supreme Court of India · 2014-10-13

Vinod Kumar vs Gangadhar

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2014 SC 261
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Vinod Kumar
Respondent
Gangadhar
Author
Abhay Manohar Sapre
Bench
Abhay Manohar Sapre, Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court's dismissal of the appellant's first appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was cryptic and failed to address the factual details and legal principles relevant to the case. The Court emphasized that the High Court must provide a reasoned judgment that considers the evidence presented. Consequently, the Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgment and remanded the matter for fresh consideration, ensuring that all issues are adequately addressed.

Vinod Kumar vs Gangadhar · Niyam