Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2014

Supreme Court of India · 2014-10-09

Gangai Vinayagar Temple & Anr vs Meenakshi Ammal & Ors

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2014 SC 174
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Gangai Vinayagar Temple & Anr
Respondent
Meenakshi Ammal & Ors
Author
Vikramajit Sen
Bench
Pinaki Chandra Ghose, Vikramajit Sen, Anil R. Dave

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the application of the principle of res judicata and Order II Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure in determining the rights of the parties involved in three related suits concerning the ownership and tenancy of a property. The Court held that the Tenants were barred from challenging the findings of the Trial Court regarding the Trust's ownership due to their failure to appeal against the judgments in O.S.5/78 and O.S.7/78, thereby affirming the principle that a party cannot re-litigate issues already decided. The outcome favored the Trust, reinforcing the finality of the Trial Court's decisions.

Gangai Vinayagar Temple & Anr vs Meenakshi Ammal & Ors · Niyam