Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2014

Supreme Court of India · 2014-10-10

M/S Ivt Vlt Cc(Jv) vs The Chairman-Cum-M.D Mcl & Ors

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S Ivt Vlt Cc(Jv)
Respondent
The Chairman-Cum-M.D Mcl & Ors
Bench
A.K. Sikri, J. Chelameswar

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's dismissal of the writ petition under Article 226, affirming that disputes arising from commercial contracts must be resolved through civil suits rather than writ jurisdiction. The Court emphasized that the contractual obligations, including wage compensation formulas as per Clause 37.06 of NIT-514, fall outside the purview of Article 226. The ruling clarifies that the appropriate legal remedy for such disputes lies in civil proceedings, reinforcing the principle that contractual matters are not amenable to writ jurisdiction.

M/S Ivt Vlt Cc(Jv) vs The Chairman-Cum-M.D Mcl & Ors · Niyam