Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2014

Supreme Court of India · 2014-11-28

S.BHASKAR REDDY vs SUPDT.OF POLICE

Citation / case number
SC 2011/15184
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
S.BHASKAR REDDY
Respondent
SUPDT.OF POLICE
Author
V.GOPALA GOWDA
Bench
C. NAGAPPAN V. GOPALA GOWDA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Rule 9 (ix) of the Andhra Pradesh Civil Services (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 1991, the borrowing authority lacks the competence to dismiss employees, which is reserved for the lending authority as per Rule 30. The Court found that the High Court erred in allowing the writ petition by interpreting the first proviso to Rule 16, thereby reinstating the Tribunal's decision that set aside the dismissal orders against the appellants. The appeal was allowed, restoring the Tribunal's order.

S.BHASKAR REDDY vs SUPDT.OF POLICE · Niyam